周谧  (教授)

博士生导师 硕士生导师

出生日期:1983-01-03

电子邮箱:zhoumi@hfut.edu.cn

入职时间:2010-03-01

所在单位:管理学院

学历:博士研究生毕业

办公地点:管理学院新大楼1105室

性别:男

联系方式:zhoumi@hfut.edu.cn

学位:博士学位

在职信息:在职

毕业院校:合肥工业大学

学科:工商管理其他专业
管理科学与工程其他专业

Group decision making based on consistency adjustment of distributed preference relations under asymmetric evaluation grades

点击次数:

DOI码:10.1007/s10489-023-05119-w

发表刊物:Applied Intelligence(中科院二区)

关键字:Distributed preference relation · Group decision making · Asymmetric and non-uniform grade set · Consistency · Evidential reasoning

摘要:Group decision making (GDM) is common in real world. Distributed preference relation (DPR) is suitable for capturing the original preference information of decision makers (DMs) in uncertain decision-making environment. The consistency of preference relations is very important to ensure the rationality of decision results. Existing research on the consistency of DPRs assumes that evaluation grades are symmetric on the scale. However, some situations such as risk assessment and investment decisions need to be evaluated with asymmetric and non-uniform evaluation grades. DMs with diferent cognitive abilities and backgrounds may tend to use multi-granular grade sets, diferences in their risk attitudes will lead to diferent meanings of grades. In this paper, a GDM method with multigranular asymmetric evaluation information is developed. First, a general grade score function is proposed to represent both symmetric and asymmetric grade sets selected by DMs. Due to the limited rationality, it is difcult to ensure that DMs’ subjective preferences are perfectly consistent. Therefore, we establish the consistency of DPRs on a set of asymmetric grades. Considering the willingness of DMs and adjustment magnitude, interactive local adjustment and global adjustment algorithms are presented to achieve acceptable consistency for inconsistent DPR matrices. The diferent grade sets are unifed through conversion between grades, which enables DPRs to be aggregated by evidential reasoning (ER) approach. An example of a decision problem involving investment risk is provided, and the results of comparative analysis demonstrate the validity of the proposed method.

合写作者:Xin‑Hong Li,Ba‑Yi Cheng,Jian Wu,Enrique Herrera‑Viedma

第一作者:Mi Zhou(通讯作者)

论文类型:期刊论文

学科门类:管理学

文献类型:J

期号:54

页面范围:1144–1178

是否译文:

发表时间:2024-01-01

收录刊物:SCI

上一条: A generalized belief dissimilarity measure based on weighted conflict belief and distance metric and its application in multi-source data fusion

下一条: 基于ER Rule 的多分类器汽车评论情感分类研究